“All 10 police officers – V Surendra, K Narasimha Reddy, Sheikh Lal Madhar, Mohd Sirajuddin, Kocherla Ravi, K Venkateshwarulu, S Arvind Gaur, D Janakiram, R Balu Rathod and D Srikanth – were tried for offenses under section 302 The Commission said, 34 IPC, 201 read with 302 IPC and 34 IPC, as the analysis of the evidence shows that the separate acts committed by each of them furthered the common intention to kill the deceased suspects. were made to increase.
Telangana government’s counsel, rejecting senior advocate’s objections shyam deewaniA bench of Chief Justice NV Ramana and Justice Hima Kohli Remitted entire pending proceedings before it to Telangana HC for appropriate action based on COI report and asked COI counsel K Parameswaran to give copies of investigation report to the parties.
There was a reason for Diwan, who had personally opposed the ‘sealed cover proceedings’ in several cases in the past, to strongly oppose the publication of the sealed cover report of the Commission of Inquiry, as the Justice Sirpurkar-led panel reviewed the state The government was reprimanded. To adopt an attitude of non-cooperation and try to prevent the truth from coming out.
In its 387-page report, the commission also concluded that three of the four accused, contrary to the Telangana government’s claim, were minors, while the police were held responsible for destroying or withholding evidence “such discrepancies”. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that either the site of the incident has been tampered with or the scene has been created as per the convenience.”
Four accused in the case- Mohammad Arif, jolu shiva, Jolu Naveen and Chintakunta Chennakesavulu- were arrested on December 6, 2019 for their alleged role in the gang rape-cum-murder of a young veterinarian on the outskirts of Chatanapalli village in Ranga Reddy district. The gruesome crime had made. Widespread outrage across the country sparked protests and candlelight. The SC had set up the Justice Sirpurkar-led CoI, which also had former Bombay HC judge Rekha Baldota and former CBI director DR Karthikeyan.
The commission “disbelieves the alleged recovery, that the deceased suspects attacked the policemen and attempted to escape, the action of the police officers in deliberate firing on the deceased suspects is not justified”.
The commission rejected the police’s claim that the accused, who had no prior experience of using guns, snatched police weapons by throwing mud in their eyes and opened fire while on the run. It pointed to the fact that no bullet was found by any of the policemen, along with no bullets or spent cartridges being found from the encounter site. It also stated that the nature of the injuries suffered by the two policemen did not require admission to the ICU for three days.
The Supreme Court-appointed panel said that some incomplete video footage of the encounter incident was presented before it. “There is no explanation on the part of the State as to why the entire footage was not placed before the Commission. The Commission is of the view that apart from the above lapses, there has been a deliberate attempt to suppress the truth from emerging,” the Commission said. ”
“Each cop was responsible for the safety of the four deceased suspects. If by either acts or omission they failed to fulfill their responsibility, their common intention to cause the death of the suspects is established. Their conduct after the death of the suspects in falsifying records indicates that they not only acted in furtherance of the common intention of providing false information for the investigation of criminals, but also that they all acted with the common intention Work done. The death of four deceased suspects,” the commission said.
watch 2019 Hyderabad encounter case: SC panel recommends levying murder charges on police