Supreme Court’s decision on permission to carry food and drink in cinema
With the decision of the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court has canceled the license of food and drink outside the censor. The top court said during the hearing that cinema hall is not a gym, where you should be given grains. It is a place of entertainment.
The Supreme Court said during the hearing that the cinema hall is the private property of the management. With all this, the Supreme Court has set aside the order of the Supreme Court, in which the High Court had allowed access to the outer open hall. But the Supreme Court, while giving unnecessary stay on that order, said that the High Court had violated its jurisdiction by giving this order.
The Supreme Court has said that symbolically food for small children and clean drinking water for all have been made available there free of cost even before the order was issued. The court said that it is the right and desire of the audience to watch which movie in which theatre. Similarly, the hall management also has the right to make rules there.
read this also
The Supreme Court filed a petition in the Supreme Court banning the food seen from outside in a cinema hall in Jammu and Kashmir. The order of the Supreme Court was challenged in the Supreme Court. The petition by Supreme Justice Diwai Chandrachud and Justice PAC Narasimha drew several points of interest during the hearing.
The CJI said that if there is a problem with Jalebi in any cinema hall, then the cinema hall management can refuse it by saying that
If after eating Jalebi, the spectators will keep their fingers from the seat, then who will pay for the damaged seat? Similarly people can bring tandoori chicken. Later there may be a complaint that their bones should be left there. Some people have trouble with that too.
The Chief Justice said that when the rule was made to telecast certain ‘special’ category films on TV after 11 pm, the objective was that adults are old enough to watch those films after the children have gone to sleep. When he was hearing such a PIL as the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, he had told another judge that adults are eating and drinking late at night. Only the children will remain awake. I asked the judge what he had ever seen after 11:00. The judge said never. it’s so late.
In fact, two people challenged the decision of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court on July 18, 2018 in the Supreme Court here. Outside food items are being taken to the cinema hall. The security personnel stopped and pleaded that the theater-goers were forced to buy and eat only sold items in their premises. It is not necessary to have those things like grains. The High Court said that the result of this ban is that the spectators are forced to buy goods sold there.
read this also:-
Kanjhawala case: No injury to victim’s private part in sight report: Sources
Rahul Gandhi visited the Marghat temple in Delhi, the Gandhi family has an old relationship with it.
featured video of the day
Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar lashed out at Pakistan, said – the center of terror is close to India