Constitution Bench of Supreme Court to hear in Bilkis Bano case
New Delhi:
Supreme Court On Tuesday, it heard the petition of Bilkis Bano in which she accused the Gujarat government of prematurely releasing the convicts in her case. In his petition, he had also challenged the decision of the 11 convicts to be released in the Supreme Court. Was. During the hearing, the Supreme Court reprimanded the Gujarat government and claimed that you should pay attention to the fact that there can never be illegal use of power. Supreme Court He said that today is Bilkis, tomorrow there will be no more. This is a case where a pregnant woman was gangraped and her seven daughters died. We had asked you (Gujarat government) to produce all the records. We want to know if you have found your sanity. If yes, please specify on what basis you have made the release of the material. The Supreme Court said during the hearing that we only want to ensure that there is actual use of power. There should be no illegal use of power. The kind of crime that was committed is horrific.
read this also
Every convict has got one thousand days parole
The court further said that every person given has got parole for more than one thousand days. We believe that when you exercise power, it should be for the public good. No matter who you are, no matter how mature you are, even if you have a conscience with the state? It must be for lack of public. Doing so is a crime against a community and society. The court asked the government from Gujarat that what message are you giving by coming in front of the culprits? How can you partner with apple? Not only this, how can you compare killing of a person with genocide?
you are in contempt of court
The court said during the hearing that despite repeated requests, the Gujarat government is not bringing before us the records of premature release of life convicts. If you don’t show us the file, we will draw our own conclusions. Also, if you do not produce the file, you are in contempt of court. In such a situation, we can initiate a contempt case against ourselves.
The Gujarat government presented its side
During the hearing, ASG SV Raju, appearing for the Center and the Gujarat government, said that we are seeking to set aside the order that we have been asked to produce the file issued by this court. We are reviewing. Time has also been sought to present several files. This is the prerogative of the government. SV Raju said that a petition has also been filed against the state government’s decision to grant remission to 11 convicts in the case of gang rape and murder of seven family members during the 2002 riots. In which he said that the culprits of corruption first shook the conscience of the society. In the last hearing, the Supreme Court had also raised questions on the release. Whether the Government of Gujarat had jurisdiction for the release? Gujarat issued under which jurisdiction? Which court can ask to consider issuing a body that does not have jurisdiction? We will consider all these phreatics.
Why did the Supreme Court say in the Bilkis case – this crime is sinister