The Bar Council said that since the inception of human civilization and culture, marriage is generally accepted and characterized as a sexual union of man and woman for the dual purpose of procreation and recreation. The Bar Council said it would be “disastrous” and that a legislature is best suited to deal with such sensitive issues.
The Bar Council of India has stated that more than 99.9% of the people of the country oppose the idea of same-sex marriage. According to the BCI, the majority of the population believes that any decision of the Supreme Court in favor of the petitioner would be against the socio-religious and cultural fabric of the country.
Bar councils across the country are also opposed to the idea of same-sex marriage. The Bar Council of India, on behalf of the Bar Council of India, has passed a resolution in this regard in the joint meeting of the Bar Councils of all the states and sent it to the Supreme Court. In this, the alert of the Bar Council has been conveyed to the court regarding gay marriage.
With this all of them and their families were brought in a state of crisis and a resolution was passed requiring a law for protection. Representatives of Bar Councils of all the states were present in the meeting.
The Bar of India has passed its resolution along with the State Councils stating that the unanimous opinion in this meeting has been to take into account a spectrum of viewpoints of socio-different-religious backs in respect of all aspects of the issue of same-sex marriage. Keeping this in mind, it has been advised that the competent legislature should take a decision after detailed consultation process with these various socio-religious geographies.
Bar Council of India chairman and senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra said that considering the socio-religious mix of the country, we thought that the idea of same-sex marriage is against our culture. Such decisions are not taken by the courts and such steps should come through the process of law.
The Bar Council of India is a statutory body established by the Bar Council of India under Section 4 of the Advocates Act 1961. This body regulates and regulates legal practice, legal practice and legal education legal education in India. Members of bar associations across the country elect its members. All the members then elect the president and other officers. In this way, this council represents the Indian Bar.
Explain that a five-judge constitution petition headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud is hearing a petition seeking to implement the basic rights of the LGBTQ+ community while appealing for legal recognition of same-sex marriage in the Supreme Court. The bench had announced on Thursday that like the Ayodhya case, hearing the petition five days a week i.e. from Monday to Friday, it would be pasted on priority basis. For this, the court will start functioning from 9.30 am instead of 10.30 am to hear new cases, but one of the five judges of the Supreme Court is also a member of this constitution bench, due to his Covid number, the Supreme Court This petition will not be heard in the court on Monday.
read this also :
, Five judges of the Supreme Court, including justice hearing the same-sex marriage case, became Corona
, “Same-sex relationship is no longer a one-time relationship, it is an enduring one”: CJI
, ‘Same sex marriage’ is not an urban concept for these two women living together in Bakalo village