Varanasi: Advocates of both sides Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri case On Saturday, he said that he would not be able to file an objection on May 31 as he had not received the photographs and video footage Videography Survey of Court Commission premises.
advocate of Gyanvapi Mosque Management Committee, Anjuman Intejamiya Mosque (AIM), Abhay Nath Yadav and the petitioners’ counsel Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi submitted that it was necessary for them to seek extension of the date for filing objections with regard to the survey as they have not received the report of the court commission till Saturday.
He said that objections can be framed only after looking at the visible facts.
Yadav said the debate on the stability of the case by his team of AIM advocates would continue on Monday as well.
The court staff of the district judge on Friday expressed their inability to issue compact discs of photographs and video footage of the court-mandated survey of the Gyanvapi mosque, citing technical reasons, advocates said. “Since the court remains closed on Saturdays and Sundays, the process of obtaining CDs of photographs and video footage will be resumed on Monday. More time will be sought from the court to file the objection.
Also on Friday, Raees Ahmed Ansari, an advocate of AIM, moved an application in the district judge’s court, requesting the advocates of both the sides to issue CDs of photographs and video footage with only a direction that it should be uploaded by anyone. not be made public.
Earlier, copies of the Gyanvapi survey footage and photographs authorized by the court could not be given to the litigants on May 25 as the number of applicants exceeded the reasonable limit. District Government Advocate (Civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey said that the number of applicants seeking Gyanvapi survey video footage and photographs collected during the work of the Court Commission from May 6 to 16 in Gyanvapi Masjid was submitted with the report in eight chips of 32 GB. Was. May 25 was too much as many people not connected to any side of the case also applied for it.
On 18 August 2021, on the petition of Rakhi Singh and Lakshmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak of Delhi, the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) demanded worship of Shringar Gauri and other deities in Gyanvapi complex. Advocate commissioner was appointed on 8th April for the videography survey of Gyanvapi Masjid.
The survey of the Court Commission was conducted between May 6 and May 16. On the last day of the survey, the Hindu side had claimed to have found a Shivling in the Vashikaran pond of Gyanvapi, after which the pond was sealed on the orders of the court. The report of the Court Commission was submitted by Special Advocate Commissioner Vishal Singh on May 19 and a day later, the Supreme Court transferred the matter from the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar to the District Judge Court on May 20 and directed also given. To determine its maintainability first.
advocate of Gyanvapi Mosque Management Committee, Anjuman Intejamiya Mosque (AIM), Abhay Nath Yadav and the petitioners’ counsel Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi submitted that it was necessary for them to seek extension of the date for filing objections with regard to the survey as they have not received the report of the court commission till Saturday.
He said that objections can be framed only after looking at the visible facts.
Yadav said the debate on the stability of the case by his team of AIM advocates would continue on Monday as well.
The court staff of the district judge on Friday expressed their inability to issue compact discs of photographs and video footage of the court-mandated survey of the Gyanvapi mosque, citing technical reasons, advocates said. “Since the court remains closed on Saturdays and Sundays, the process of obtaining CDs of photographs and video footage will be resumed on Monday. More time will be sought from the court to file the objection.
Also on Friday, Raees Ahmed Ansari, an advocate of AIM, moved an application in the district judge’s court, requesting the advocates of both the sides to issue CDs of photographs and video footage with only a direction that it should be uploaded by anyone. not be made public.
Earlier, copies of the Gyanvapi survey footage and photographs authorized by the court could not be given to the litigants on May 25 as the number of applicants exceeded the reasonable limit. District Government Advocate (Civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey said that the number of applicants seeking Gyanvapi survey video footage and photographs collected during the work of the Court Commission from May 6 to 16 in Gyanvapi Masjid was submitted with the report in eight chips of 32 GB. Was. May 25 was too much as many people not connected to any side of the case also applied for it.
On 18 August 2021, on the petition of Rakhi Singh and Lakshmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas and Rekha Pathak of Delhi, the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) demanded worship of Shringar Gauri and other deities in Gyanvapi complex. Advocate commissioner was appointed on 8th April for the videography survey of Gyanvapi Masjid.
The survey of the Court Commission was conducted between May 6 and May 16. On the last day of the survey, the Hindu side had claimed to have found a Shivling in the Vashikaran pond of Gyanvapi, after which the pond was sealed on the orders of the court. The report of the Court Commission was submitted by Special Advocate Commissioner Vishal Singh on May 19 and a day later, the Supreme Court transferred the matter from the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar to the District Judge Court on May 20 and directed also given. To determine its maintainability first.