How India Can Minimize Losses From OPEC+ Production Cuts

This is a blow to global growth, the fight against inflation and financial stability. OPEC+, now that they have taught the short sellers a lesson, should consider increasing production so as not to kill growth and oil demand.

While OPEC draws criticism for high oil prices with its publicized production cut – the second since last October – another culprit escapes attention: US shale producers. While the fall in global oil prices in 2014 hurt US shale producers, who had increased production to make the US the largest producer of crude, their refusal to increase production significantly contributed to the rise in oil prices. Is.

The price of oil that makes shale oil production viable is generally thought to be around $60 to $65 per barrel, meaning that since the decline in oil prices, the US shale oil industry has made more shareholder returns than increasing production. More focused on service. ,

The World Bank’s annual publication, Global Economic Prospects, sees a lost decade for the world’s developing countries, given the current economic climate of rampant inflation, high interest rates, pressure on developing countries to depreciate against the dollar (which includes oil and other major items have been designated and debt repayments to be made), and a policy-induced recession or outright recession in advanced economies.

High oil prices widen the current account deficits of countries such as India, which import oil, and depreciate local currencies. To counter the resulting rise in imported inflation and prevent further depreciation of the currency, the developing country’s central bank feels compelled to raise its policy rates of interest. High rates discourage investment and growth. Furthermore, an increase in rates reduces the value of assets held by banks, creating the potential for financial fragility.

While it is not directly in India’s hands to increase the global supply of oil, it is up to New Delhi to adopt measures that reduce the damage caused by higher oil prices. The government has removed windfall profit tax on oil companies and reduced export duty on refined product exports. It’s all for the best. This provides a cushion for oil companies to absorb some of the increase in prices without having to fully and immediately pass them on to consumers.

The government should avoid trying to use the exchequer to minimize the impact on consumers. The increase in fiscal deficit, to bear the burden of fuel subsidy, would meet additional demand across the board and moderate inflation. A calibrated increase in fuel prices will reduce fuel consumption and limit the impact on prices to some extent.

Meanwhile, India should ramp up oil imports from Russia and make efforts to upgrade more refineries to handle Ural-grade crude coming from there.

While the G7 has imposed a price cap of $60 a barrel on oil from Russia, it is not being enforced with any kind of rigour. It is reported that Japan, a member of the G7, has started importing oil from Russia at a price higher than the prescribed limit. There are also reports that some countries pay a higher premium for Russian oil routed through indirect channels than the price formally billed. Some are also using tanker fleets that do not take advantage of insurance and reinsurance from Western sources to reduce price caps on Russian oil exports.

Reversing production cuts by OPEC+ is one way to avoid damaging the prospects of developing countries. The second US shell is increasing the production of firecrackers.

A third – and the most sensible – option is to find a compromise solution to the hostilities in Ukraine, which would cool down oil, food and fertilizer prices. These are not mutually exclusive alternatives but complementary. India must take all three forward by helping shape public opinion around the world.