The matter of protecting the slogan of Banke Bihari temple is in the Supreme Court. (file photo)
New Delhi:
The defense case against the famous Banke Bihari Temple (Banke Bihari Mandir) of Vrindavan (Vrindavan) has reached the Supreme Court (Supreme Court). The petitioner has described himself as the servant and protector of his adorable Thakur ji from generation to generation. Also, deep arguments have been given on the suggestion of the Allahabad High Court (Allahabad High Court), which states that the temple’s funds should be used for the development of the area.
read this also
To protect the flag i.e. the treasury of the famous Banke Bihari temple of Vrindavan, the servants created a ruckus in the Supreme Court. On Monday, Swaroop Chaturvedi, a separate advocate of the Chief Justice’s bench in the Supreme Court, sought a hearing on the petition by shinning the matter. The court agreed to hold the hearing next Monday. In the meeting held on Monday, the servants of Banke Bihari temple have expressed deep objection to the complaint of the Allahabad High Court that the funds of the temple should be used for the development of the area.
In the petition, the petitioner has described himself as the servant and protector of his adorable Thakur ji from generation to generation. Because here Thakur Banke is in the form of Bihari’s five year old boy. The petitioner has personally served and mentored Thakurji for more than five decades. The services have challenged the advice given to the Supreme Court in the order dated 20 December 2022 of the High Court. In the same order, the High Court had suggested to prepare a detailed development plan for the use of SIM card in the account of Shri Banke Bihari.
Prior to this order, till October 18, 2022, according to the order of the High Court, the Uttar Pradesh government had to bear the cost of purchasing the land to develop the facilities around the temple. Both these were given in the context of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed for improving the infrastructure and inside of the temple. But there was a stark contrast between the two.
In their petition challenging the Supreme Court in December last year, Sewayat said that the High Court neither allowed them to appear nor heard them on that PIL. Being a stakeholder, he was bound to be killed, but the court issued the order without giving him an opportunity to be in his favor.
The petitioner services apprehensions that the State Government wants to usurp the affairs of the management of this private temple in the name of development and maintenance. The plea argued that if the High Court’s offer to access temple funds is implemented, the government would exercise its powers in temple administration. According to one’s faith, the right to serve and worship one’s deity will be completely violated.
read this also :
featured video of the day
Country/State: Question on Rahul Gandhi’s security in Kashmir