Rationale behind textbook rationalization – Times of India

As part of measures to rationalize its curriculum, the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) last month removed subjects from its Class XII textbooks about the 2002 Gujarat riots, Emergency, Cold War, Naxalite movement and Mughal courts, among other subjects. Removed some parts. The move was cited as facilitating faster recovery among students as they integrate themselves with offline classes, and compensate for the loss of time due to school closures during the pandemic phase. The changes in school textbooks were also in line with the NEP 2020, it was claimed, as the reduction in content and increased flexibility of the school curriculum would lead to a renewed emphasis on creative learning against the widespread rote culture.

Irfan Habib, historian and professor emeritus of Aligarh Muslim University, says that the selective removal of sections from textbooks “reflects a misinterpretation of history that can affect entire generations; It will also hamper the chronological disclosure of events which will make it difficult for the students to grasp the facts”.

Congratulations!

you successfully cast your vote

He further said that students of history should be aware that societies were structured differently, but the rationalization of the textbook, may deprive them of that notion. “For example, the abolition of foreign rule reflects ignorance about the economic, social and intellectual history of those eras. In short, history can be reduced to mere propaganda,” he says. Talking about the changes in the Delhi University (DU), a senior academic at Delhi University (DU), on the condition of anonymity, said, “History is an important inquiry into the past. It is not about cleaning up the years. Academic burden Teachers can reduce as many rubrics as possible in order to reduce them, but eliminating the whole part entirely would be tantamount to proving the past wrong.

He further adds, “Cleaning up history should not be the agenda of any course as students will develop a distorted understanding of the past. Considering the fact that a lot of information now comes through social media, which is often Incorrect and badly researched, removing some sections will further confuse students. In the long run, it may affect their overseas careers, as questions may be raised about their conceptual clarity and foundation If their minds are not attuned to developing critical intelligence about the past, how will they develop into capable graduates?”

The Faculty underscores that history as a subject may not be a “fairy tale”, but rather an impartially critical juxtaposition of the past in keeping with the present. “Therefore, such rationalization can do little to maintain that balance,” he says.

Anshu Mittal, principal of MRG School, Rohini, New Delhi, has a different point of view, as she says, “Although all sections are important, NCERT has done due diligence to remove some of the subjects that have already been taught. and was discussed extensively in the previous classes. It is a remedial curriculum measure to reduce the study load of the students and reduce the material overlap.”

She further claims that the students as a whole have a strong sense of political and historical awareness. “They are well versed in medieval and modern history from a very young age, so there will be no problem of continuity. Since they have been doing well in History classes and tests since the introduction of offline classes, re-reading the same section in Class XII will be a repetitive exercise, and even exhausting for them Will happen. ,